🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its decision.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action is part of a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic representatives criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

A top House leader argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.